We provide rigorous, independent conformity assessments and premier compliance architectures for high-risk AI systems in the European Union.
We bridge the gap between abstract legal mandates and concrete engineering implementations.
End-to-end Article 43 conformity assessments for high-risk AI systems. Mandatory documentation review and QMS auditing.
Learn more →Deep-dive technical audits into training data provenance, bias mitigation, and compliance with Article 10 mandates.
Learn more →Detailed evaluation of current AI governance frameworks against EU AI Act requirements, identifying vulnerabilities.
Learn more →Determine your exact risk exposure, calculate potential fines, and track your AI systems securely.
A secure, local-storage registry to log and classify all AI systems across your organization in compliance with Article 51.
OPEN REGISTRY →Calculate your exact global revenue exposure against the EU AI Act's severe financial penalty tiers.
CALCULATE EXPOSURE →Analyze recent model updates to determine if they trigger a "Substantial Modification" requiring re-certification under Article 43.
RUN AUDIT →The rollout is staggered, but key deadlines have already passed. Track your compliance horizon.
Obligations for prohibited AI practices and AI literacy requirements are now fully enforceable.
GPAI model obligations and EU governance structures have taken effect.
The vast majority of rules are currently coming into force. Enforcement audits have actively begun.
Final deadline for standalone high-risk AI systems to achieve full compliance and deploy Article 11 technical documentation.
Download our battle-tested templates to understand the sheer volume of manual documentation required—then let us automate it for you.
A 40-page blueprint covering the exact design choices, training data provenance, and post-market logs required by auditors.
A printable, line-by-line checklist of the exact artifacts a Notified Body will demand during an Article 43 audit.
A questionnaire to send to your third-party software vendors to ensure their models aren't exposing your firm to liabilities.
A rigorous, four-phase assessment methodology designed to withstand the highest levels of regulatory scrutiny.
Precise determination of risk categorization, intended purpose mapping, and jurisdictional applicability.
Deep evaluation of data governance, transparency metrics, robustness, and cybersecurity.
Assessment of the provider's Quality Management System, post-market monitoring, and human oversight.
Issuance of the formal Declaration of Conformity and generation of technical documentation.
Non-compliance carries penalties of up to €35M. Don't leave your AI deployments to chance.
To ensure we have ample time to deeply research your system architecture before we meet, we strictly cap our calendar at 3 initial discovery calls per day. Secure your slot below.
Critical intelligence regarding EU AI Act deployment.
Article 11 Technical Documentation is a hybrid legal-engineering requirement. It is not a standard GitHub README. It requires mapping your specific ML architecture to rigid European legal frameworks. Forcing engineers to do this manually drains hundreds of hours of costly development time and often fails regulatory scrutiny. We automate this exact translation.
The EU AI Act is already in force. Prohibited AI systems face immediate enforcement. High-Risk systems have a strict grace period, after which non-compliant software will be legally banned from the European market, and companies will face fines up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover.
It is entirely frictionless for your team. You provide access to your existing system architecture diagrams, training data logs, and security reports via our secure data room. Our proprietary engine processes this raw engineering data and generates a fully compliant, board-ready Article 11 Evidence Pack within days, alongside a precise Gap Analysis for any operational deficiencies.